Scientific integrity, misconduct in science.
نویسنده
چکیده
Many scientists consider scientific integrity to be a self-evident basic moral attitude. They are of the honest opinion that scientific misconduct is very rare and they also cannot imagine that it could in fact occur in their own institutions.However, this opinion must be considered in the light of international experience in this respect. There are still many examples of scientific misconduct. Striking examples are taken up by the media, such as the South Korean case of pretended successful cloning of human blastocytes, from which embryonal stem cells were said to have been cultured and which in fact proved to be the result of a hoax [1], or the “proof”, from Norway, that antiinflammatory drugs reduce the incidence of cancer of the mouth, which was in fact based on totally fictitious data [2]. Switzerland is also involved.A very special example is the case of a theological ethicist who was accused of plagiarism at the University of Geneva [3]. The US Office of Research Integrity regularly publishes new medical cases in its newsletters [4]. The following text is based on, among other things, the guidelines published by the Swiss Academies of Sciences to provide research institutions, their students and their personnel with an overview of the subject. These guidelines, under the title “Scientific Integrity. Principles and Procedures”, were drawn up by a working group of the four scientific academies and published in 2008 [5].
منابع مشابه
Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
UNLABELLED A review of the United States Office of Research Integrity annual reports identified 228 individuals who have committed misconduct, of which 94% involved fraud. Analysis of the data by career stage and gender revealed that misconduct occurred across the entire career spectrum from trainee to senior scientist and that two-thirds of the individuals found to have committed misconduct we...
متن کاملORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL SCIENCE FORUM Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct
Misconduct in research (for example, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism) damages the scientific enterprise, is a misuse of public funds, and undermines the trust of citizens in science and in government. Misconduct is a special concern for governmental administrators, who are the primary constituency of the OECD Global Science Forum. On behalf of the public, and to achieve societal bene...
متن کاملWhen conflict-of-interest is a factor in scientific misconduct.
Under the guidelines adopted by the United States (U.S.) Office of Research Integrity (ORI), scientific misconduct is defined by one or more of three activities: fabrication of data, falsification of results, and plagiarism or the improper appropriation of other people's ideas or written work. This paper discusses whether three other breaches in scientific ethics, namely ghost writing, fabricat...
متن کاملResearch integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts.
The commercialization of research and the ever changing scientific environment has led scholars to shift the focus from promoting research integrity to regulating misconduct. As a result, most literature explains research integrity in terms of avoidance of misconduct. The purpose of the paper is to stimulate reflection and discussion on research integrity and research misconduct. This article e...
متن کاملThe study of the role of education in controlling scientific misconduct in Iran: using Grounded Theory
The study of the role of education in controlling scientific misconduct in Iran: using Grounded TheoryScientific misconduct in the most general sense is a deliberate violation of methodical and moral norms with the intention of deceiving others. Falsification, fabrication and plagiarism formally had been considered as the main examples of scientific misconduct by some researchers. In recent yea...
متن کاملFraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct.
Almost 2 years after Woo Suk Hwang and colleagues published groundbreaking work on the creation of human embryonic stem-cell lines, an investigation committee from Seoul National University, South Korea, announced that much of the research had been fabricated. Human embryos had not been cloned and stem-cell lines had not been derived from patient-specific somatic cells. Science retracted the tw...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Swiss medical weekly
دوره 140 13-14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010